The US Obesity Epidemic is Due Solely to Increased Food Intake
The amount of food Americans eat has been increasing since the 1970s, and that alone is the cause of the obesity epidemic in the US today [1]. Physical activity--or the lack thereof--has played virtually no role in the rising number of expanding American waistlines, according to recent research.
Lead author and director of the World Health Organization collaborating
Center for Obesity Prevention (Deakin University, Melbourne,
Australia), Dr. Boyd Swinburn stated that, “The finding is contrary to
the widely held assumption that decreased physical activity is an
equally important driver of overweight and obesity in the US…. If
Americans want to get serious about winning the battle of the bulge,
they are going to have to cut down on the amount of food they eat.”
But, he warned, that won't be easy. "The food industry has done
such a great job of marketing their products, making the food so tasty
that it's almost irresistible, pricing their products just right, and
placing them everywhere, that it is very hard for the average person to
resist temptation. Food is virtually everywhere."
How much this rise in obesity has been driven by excess calorie
intake and how much by decreased physical activity has been a topic of
debate for years but has been difficult to pin down, Swinburn said. He
and his colleagues estimated those proportions by devising a series of
equations that took into account energy intake, energy expenditure, and
body size in 963 children and 1,399 adults. They also analyzed the US
Dept. of Agriculture (USDA) food-supply data to determine how much food
had actually been delivered to the US population between 1970 and 2002.
Using that information, they then predicted the increases in weight
in children and adults between 1971 and 1976 and between 1999 and 2002.
If the predicted weight equaled the observed weight, increased food
consumption was presumed to be the cause of the weight increase. If the
predicted weight was higher or lower than the weight that was actually
observed, it was assumed that changes in physical-activity levels were
the cause.
As shown in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
(NHANES) data, the mean weight gain in children was as the researchers
had predicted--4.0 kg--and therefore attributed to increased calorie
consumption alone. In adults, the predicted increase in mean
weight--10.8 kg--was higher than the observed mean weight gain--8.6
kg--and this implied that increased physical activity might have
moderated the effect to some extent.
"Americans have been eating more; the USDA data clearly show this.
But US epidemiological data shows that physical-activity levels haven't
really changed all that much. So I think we have to be much more
focused on the energy-intake side of the energy-balance equation in
understanding what the drivers of obesity are and also in working out
what the solutions are," Swinburn commented. "We still need to continue
to promote increases in physical activity, because exercise has a lot
of positive physiologic benefits, but our level of expectation about
the impact of physical activity on weight gain has to be a bit more
tempered."
Promoting physical activity has been the favored approach to
solving the problem of obesity by politicians and the food industry,
said Swinburn. "It's relatively uncontroversial, there are no
commercial competitors, it's a positive thing to do, so politicians,
egged on by the food industry, heavily promote the physical-activity
side of the equation."
Swinburn said that the food industry has been "extraordinarily
successful" in promoting excessive intake of calories. "They've worked
their marketing out to the nth degree. They've got the products that we
like to eat, they've got the price right--in fact the price of junk
food has been coming down for years and is getting cheaper and cheaper.
The food industry has also mastered promotion, especially to the most
vulnerable and impressionable members of society--children. "Over the
past 30 years they have become very sophisticated in marketing and
advertising that is particularly iniquitous in relation to kids. They
are adept in the way they turn kids into liking, preferring, demanding,
and pestering for the foods that they advertise."
"The main cause of the obesity epidemic in this country is the wide
availability of high-caloric foods and the fact that we are eating way
too many calories in the course of a day. Exercise has much less
impact."
Sorrentino said that about 90% of weight loss is achieved by
cutting calories; only about 10% of weight loss is achieved by
significantly increasing physical activity.
There needs to be a population-based approach to teach people how
to count and cut calories, choose whole foods instead of packaged
foods, and increase their awareness of just how fattening going out for
dinner can be.
"Studies have shown that when you go out to eat, most individuals
will eat on average 500 more calories per meal than they would eat at
the same meal at home. There are now huge varieties of fast food, in
packages and in fast-food restaurants, and they are usually calorically
dense, full of carbohydrates, and sweetened, so they taste good and you
want more. Years ago, you had to prepare food; now they're all prepared
for you."
Presented at the 2009 European Congress on Obesity.
Swinburn B. Increased energy intake alone virtually explains all
the increase in body weight in the United States from the 1970s to the
2000s. 2009 European Congress on Obesity; May 6-9, 2009; Amsterdam, the
Netherlands. Abstract T1:RS3.3.
Souce: www.diabetesincontrol.com